Weighing the Giants I: Weak Lensing Masses for 51 Massive Galaxy Clusters - Project Overview, Data Analysis Methods, and Cluster Images. (arXiv:1208.0597v1 [astro-ph.CO])

Weighing the Giants I: Weak Lensing Masses for 51 Massive Galaxy Clusters - Project Overview, Data Analysis Methods, and Cluster Images. (arXiv:1208.0597v1 [astro-ph.CO]):
This is the first in a series of papers in which we measure accurate
weak-lensing masses for 51 of the most X-ray luminous galaxy clusters known at
redshifts 0.15<z<0.7, in order to calibrate X-ray and other mass proxies for
cosmological cluster experiments. The primary aim is to improve the absolute
mass calibration of cluster observables, currently the dominant systematic
uncertainty for cluster count experiments. Key elements of this work are the
rigorous quantification of systematic uncertainties, high-quality data
reduction and photometric calibration, and the "blind" nature of the analysis
to avoid confirmation bias. Our target clusters are drawn from RASS X-ray
catalogs, and provide a versatile calibration sample for many aspects of
cluster cosmology. We have acquired wide-field, high-quality imaging using the
Subaru and CFHT telescopes for all 51 clusters, in at least three bands per
cluster. For a subset of 27 clusters, we have data in at least five bands,
allowing accurate photo-z estimates of lensed galaxies. In this paper, we
describe the cluster sample and observations, and detail the processing of the
SuprimeCam data to yield high-quality images suitable for robust weak-lensing
shape measurements and precision photometry. For each cluster, we present
wide-field color optical images and maps of the weak-lensing mass distribution,
the optical light distribution, and the X-ray emission, providing insights into
the large-scale structure in which the clusters are embedded. We measure the
offsets between X-ray centroids and Brightest Cluster Galaxies in the clusters,
finding these to be small in general, with a median of 20kpc. For offsets
<100kpc, weak-lensing mass measurements centered on the BCGs agree well with
values determined relative to the X-ray centroids; miscentering is therefore
not a significant source of systematic uncertainty for our mass measurements.
[abridged]