Thursday, July 26, 2012

Gemini GMOS and WHT SAURON integral-field spectrograph observations of the AGN driven outflow in NGC 1266. (arXiv:1207.5799v1 [astro-ph.CO])

Gemini GMOS and WHT SAURON integral-field spectrograph observations of the AGN driven outflow in NGC 1266. (arXiv:1207.5799v1 [astro-ph.CO]):
We use the SAURON and GMOS integral field spectrographs to observe the active
galactic nucleus (AGN) powered outflow in NGC 1266. This unusual galaxy is
relatively nearby (D=30 Mpc), allowing us to investigate the process of AGN
feedback in action. We present maps of the kinematics and line strengths of the
ionised gas emission lines Halpha, Hbeta, [OIII], [OI], [NII] and [SII], and
report on the detection of Sodium D absorption. We use these tracers to explore
the structure of the source, derive the ionised and atomic gas kinematics and
investigate the gas excitation and physical conditions. NGC 1266 contains two
ionised gas components along most lines of sight, tracing the ongoing outflow
and a component closer to the galaxy systemic, the origin of which is unclear.
This gas appears to be disturbed by a nascent AGN jet. We confirm that the
outflow in NGC 1266 is truly multiphase, containing radio plasma, atomic,
molecular and ionised gas and X-ray emitting plasma. The outflow has velocities
up to \pm900 km/s away from the systemic velocity, and is very likely to be
removing significant amounts of cold gas from the galaxy. The LINER-like
line-emission in NGC 1266 is extended, and likely arises from fast shocks
caused by the interaction of the radio jet with the ISM. These shocks have
velocities of up to 800 km/s, which match well with the observed velocity of
the outflow. Sodium D equivalent width profiles are used to set constraints on
the size and orientation of the outflow. The ionised gas morphology correlates
with the nascent radio jets observed in 1.4 GHz and 5 GHz continuum emission,
supporting the suggestion that an AGN jet is providing the energy required to
drive the outflow.

RKS Note: Introduction has nice two-paragraph description of the feedback problem.

No comments:

Post a Comment